A patchwork world: why rules change at every border
Crypto is global; regulation is national. A token that is a commodity in one country may be a security in another; a service legal in one jurisdiction may be banned in a neighboring one. Cross-border activity raises choice-of-law, licensing, and sanctions questions. When in doubt, get qualified local counsel — this unit is educational, not legal advice.
For a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction breakdown of regulators, stance, KYC/AML rules, tax treatment, and a per-country policy timeline with cited sources, see the Regulation by Country reference page. For a chronological view of the global policy moves behind these stances, see the Policy Timeline showcase.
This unit is a high-level orientation, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. For any real decision, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction(s).
Key takeaways
A one-page summary of Regulation & Compliance. Print it for quick reference.
- Regulated crypto firms must do KYC, AML, and CFT; the FATF Travel Rule requires passing sender/beneficiary info with transfers.
- Sanctions (OFAC) screening applies even to self-custody users — interacting with sanctioned addresses can be illegal.
- The Howey test decides if a token is a US security (investment in a common enterprise expecting profit from others’ efforts).
- Bitcoin/Ether are treated as commodities (CFTC); spot and futures ETFs give traditional investors exposure.
- MiCA is the EU’s comprehensive framework; qualified custodians affect segregation and bankruptcy treatment.
- Stablecoin reserve attestations support the peg; tax/record-keeping is required in most jurisdictions. This is educational, not legal advice.
Unit check
80% to complete this unitPass the unit check (4 of 5) to complete this unit.